- 13 - petitioner had wanted to dispute any of these matters, it would have been extraordinarily easy for him to have done so.3 Given the factual basis for respondent's deficiency determinations, as supplemented in respondent's motion to dismiss, for the taxable years in issue, petitioner is in no position to argue that such determinations are arbitrary. Zuhone v. Commissioner, 883 F.2d 1317, 1325-1326 (7th Cir. 1989), affg. T.C. Memo. 1988-142. Because the petition, amended petition, and second amended petition fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, we will grant respondent's motion to dismiss, as supplemented.4 See Scherping v. Commissioner, 747 F.2d 478 (8th Cir. 1984). We will also deny petitioner's two motions because they represent nothing other than a restatement of the claims made by petitioner in his pleadings. 3 The fact that petitioner may deny receiving taxable income, as opposed to compensation, is to no avail. In this regard, the record is clear that petitioner's views on what is taxable are not based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, but rather reflect frivolous and groundless tax-protester arguments. 4 The fact that respondent has conceded part of the deficiency and additions to tax for 1992, as well as part of the addition to tax under sec. 6654(a) for 1991, is attributable to the Court's involvement in this case and not to any effort by petitioner to address the merits of this case.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011