Craig A. Bratcher - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          petitioner had wanted to dispute any of these matters, it would             
          have been extraordinarily easy for him to have done so.3                    
               Given the factual basis for respondent's deficiency                    
          determinations, as supplemented in respondent's motion to                   
          dismiss, for the taxable years in issue, petitioner is in no                
          position to argue that such determinations are arbitrary.  Zuhone           
          v. Commissioner, 883 F.2d 1317, 1325-1326 (7th Cir. 1989), affg.            
          T.C. Memo. 1988-142.                                                        
               Because the petition, amended petition, and second amended             
          petition fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted,            
          we will grant respondent's motion to dismiss, as supplemented.4             
          See Scherping v. Commissioner, 747 F.2d 478 (8th Cir. 1984).  We            
          will also deny petitioner's two motions because they represent              
          nothing other than a restatement of the claims made by petitioner           
          in his pleadings.                                                           




          3 The fact that petitioner may deny receiving taxable                       
          income, as opposed to compensation, is to no avail.  In this                
          regard, the record is clear that petitioner's views on what is              
          taxable are not based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code,           
          but rather reflect frivolous and groundless tax-protester                   
          arguments.                                                                  

          4 The fact that respondent has conceded part of the                         
          deficiency and additions to tax for 1992, as well as part of the            
          addition to tax under sec. 6654(a) for 1991, is attributable to             
          the Court's involvement in this case and not to any effort by               
          petitioner to address the merits of this case.                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011