The Brinson Company-Midwest, Inc., et al - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          Federal income tax returns for taxable years 1989 and 1990,                 
          petitioners claimed their allocable portions of the amortized               
          noncompetition agreements with respect to both Brigitte and                 
          Michael.  Although respondent was originally satisfied with the             
          valuation of the noncompetition agreement with respect to                   
          Michael, respondent was not so satisfied with respect to                    
          Brigitte.  Maintaining that the noncompetition agreement with               
          respect to Brigitte was inaccurately valued, respondent mailed a            
          notice of deficiency with respect to taxable years 1989 and 1990            
          to each petitioner on September 24, 1993.  In each deficiency               
          notice, respondent disallowed the portion of the amortization of            
          the noncompetition agreement allocated amongst petitioners with             
          respect to Brigitte.                                                        
               In January 1995, less than 2 months prior to trial, Michael            
          informed respondent that his testimony at trial would differ from           
          information he had earlier provided to respondent's agent.  In              
          light of this information previously unknown to respondent,                 
          respondent reassessed her position and ultimately conceded each             
          case.  This full concession was reflected in decisions filed with           
          this Court when the cases were called for trial, but their                  
          decisions were subsequently vacated in order to permit                      
          petitioners to file their motion for reasonable costs.                      
          Discussion                                                                  
               Under section 7430(a), a "prevailing party", in specified              
          civil tax proceedings, may be awarded a judgment for reasonable             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011