- 32 - a petition for readjustment, then the petition for readjustment must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Clovis I v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 980 (1987); Maxwell v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. at 789. Respondent bears the burden of proving that the notice of FPAA was mailed to the tax matters partner, as well as the date on which it was mailed. Cf. Coleman v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 82, 90 (1990); Cataldo v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 522, 524 (1973), affd. 499 F.2d 550 (2d Cir. 1974); August v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1535, 1537 (1970). Based upon the record in this case, there can be no dispute about the fact that on January 28, 1991, respondent mailed duplicate notices of FPAA by certified mail to the street address listed on the partnership's 1983 return, one copy addressed to "Wayne H. Caldwell, Escrow" and a second copy, the generic notice of FPAA, addressed to "Tax Matters Partner c/o Wayne H. Caldwell Escrow". At trial, respondent introduced U.S. Postal Service Form 3877, which reflects the mailing of the duplicate notices of FPAA on January 28, 1991, and petitioners have stipulated that the generic notice of FPAA was mailed on that date. Form 3877 is highly probative evidence of the fact and date of mailing. United States v. Ahrens, 530 F.2d 781, 784 (8th Cir. 1976); Coleman v. Commissioner, supra at 90-91.Page: Previous 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011