Wayne Caldwell Escrow Partnership, Roy Dimon, John and Mary Schuenemann, Joseph and Louise O'Neal, Charles and Lovetta Niven, Chalton and Cynthia Thomas, Partners Other Than the Tax Matters Partner - Page 41

                                       - 41 -                                         
             support of that ground, petitioners assert that even if we               
             find that the notice of FPAA was mailed to the notice                    
             partners, it was not mailed until after the expiration of                
             the period of limitations on assessment and, thus, was not               
             mailed within the time required by section 6223(d)(2).                   
             In effect, petitioners contend that section 6223(d)(2)                   
             incorporates the period of limitations on assessment set                 
             forth in section 6229 and that expiration of the period                  
             of limitations precludes timely notice under section                     
             6223(d)(2) and, in effect, is one of the events described                
             by section 6231(b)(1) under which partnership items become               
             nonpartnership items.                                                    
                  We agree that if the Commissioner, as the Secretary's               
             delegate, fails to mail the notice of FPAA to any notice                 
             partner within the time prescribed by section 6223(d)(2),                
             and if the partnership level proceedings are finished at                 
             the time the Commissioner mails notice of the proceedings                
             to the notice partner, then the partnership items of the                 
             notice partner are treated as nonpartnership items under                 
             section 6223(e)(2) unless that partner elects otherwise.                 
             In this case, however, as discussed below, we find no                    
             factual or legal basis on which to conclude that respondent              
             failed to mail the notice of FPAA to notice partners as                  








Page:  Previous  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011