B. Theodore and Wendy Chapin - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         

          after each tenant, a cleaning service cleaned the property.                 
          While we do not know how much time these services took, they                
          involve a substantial amount of time.  It is petitioners' burden            
          to show that they satisfy the requirements of section 1.469-                
          5T(a)(3), Temporary Income Tax Regs., supra, and they have failed           
          to meet that burden.5                                                       
               Petitioners alternatively contend that, if they fail the so-           
          called safe harbor provisions of paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of               
          section 1.469-5T, Temporary Income Tax Regs., supra, they                   
          nonetheless satisfy the requirements of section 1.469-5T(a)(7),             
          Temporary Income Tax Regs., supra.  Section 1.469-5T(a)(7),                 
          Temporary Income Tax Regs., supra, mirrors the statutory                    
          definition of "material participation" set out in section                   
          469(h)(1) and requires that petitioners show they participated in           
          the activity on a regular, continuous, and substantial basis                
          during each year.  As an initial matter, petitioners'                       
          participation must exceed 100 hours each year.  Sec. 1.469-                 
          5T(b)(2)(iii), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 53 Fed. Reg. 5726                
          (Feb. 25, 1988).  Measuring participation in terms of time may be           
          useful in setting minimum requirements and in defining safe                 


          5   No witness from the rental agency testified.  Mr. Chapin                
          attempted to testify as to his estimate of the hours spent by the           
          rental agent in connection with the rental and maintenance of the           
          condominium.  Respondent objected on the ground that Mr. Chapin             
          did not have personal knowledge of that fact.  The objection was            
          sustained.                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011