- 6 - For the years 1987, 1988, and 1989, FOTA filed its Federal income tax returns in accordance with an election made pursuant to section 1362(a), commonly referred to as an S election. For the years in issue, petitioner's individual Federal income tax returns reflected petitioner's distributive share of the losses incurred by FOTA in the amounts of $45,035, $23,180, and $63,512, respectively. Although the record is incomplete as to the circumstances surrounding the filing of FOTA's Federal income tax returns for the years in issue and respondent's examination of those returns, it appears that respondent made adjustments to the amount of losses reported by FOTA for the years 1987, 1988, and 1989. In a portion of FOTA's examination report included with the notice of deficiency issued to petitioner, respondent provided the following explanation for certain of the adjustments:3 The deductions for business use of your dwelling unit are limited to the gross income from the business activity after subtracting the business part of your real estate taxes, mortgage interest, and expenditures required for the activity but not allocable to the use of the unit itself. [emphasis added]. The Court was invited to ignore the exhibit when this inconsistency was called to the attention of the parties in a posttrial conference. Because the technical ownership of the building has no impact on the outcome of the issue under consideration, we honor the stipulation and proceed as though petitioner was, in fact, the owner of the building. 3Certain allocations and other adjustments were made by respondent in connection with her examinations of FOTA and petitioner. Petitioner only contests the adjustments that depend upon the resolution of the issue disputed in this proceeding.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011