Richard H. Daley and Estate of Anne H. Daley, Deceased, Richard H. Daley, Executor - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          expectation that the assets used in the activity may appreciate             
          in value; (5) the success of the taxpayer in carrying on other              
          similar or dissimilar activities; (6) the taxpayer's history of             
          income or losses with respect to the activity; (7) the amount of            
          occasional profits, if any, that are earned; (8) the financial              
          status of the taxpayer; and (9) the elements of personal pleasure           
          or recreation involved in the activity.                                     
               A careful review of the entire record in this case convinces           
          us that petitioner has failed to carry his burden in proving that           
          his horse activity was motivated by an actual and honest                    
          objective of making a profit.  The objective facts indicate that            
          most of the above-enumerated factors weigh in favor of                      
          respondent.                                                                 
          Issue 1.  Profit Motive                                                     
          Businesslike Manner & Adequate Records                                      
               The fact that an activity is carried on in a businesslike              
          manner and complete and accurate books and records are maintained           
          is a factor indicating the existence of a profit objective with             
          respect to such activity.  Sec. 1.183-2(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.             
          Respondent argues that petitioner failed to operate his horse               
          activity in a businesslike manner.  In support of this argument,            
          respondent advances several contentions.5  First, respondent                
          argues that petitioner failed to conduct a formal market study              

               5To the extent that such arguments are not addressed herein,           
          we have found them to be without merit.                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011