Ferdinand Decaprio and Claire Decaprio - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
               false and fraudulent income tax return, and that by                    
               reason of such fraud, there is for said year an under-                 
               payment of income tax.                                                 
                         (i)  The prior guilty plea by Petitioner                     
               Ferdinand DeCaprio is conclusive and binding on him,                   
               and by reason thereof, he is estopped in the instant                   
               case under the doctrine of collateral estoppel                         
               (estoppel by judgment), from denying herein that he                    
               willfully filed a false and fraudulent income tax                      
               return for the taxable year 1983 with intent to evade                  
               and defeat a part of the income tax due and owing by                   
               him for said year, and that due to such fraud there is                 
               for said year an underpayment of tax within the meaning                
               of I.R.C. � 6653(b).                                                   
                         (j)  By reason of such a guilty plea, peti-                  
               tioner Ferdinand DeCaprio is estopped in the instant                   
               case, under the doctrine of collateral estoppel                        
               (estoppel by judgment), from denying that a part of the                
               underpayment of income tax for the taxable year 1983 is                
               due to fraud, and that, therefore, he is liable for the                
               addition to tax imposed by I.R.C. � 6653(b), as deter-                 
               mined by respondent in the statutory notice of defi-                   
               ciency, upon which notice the instant case is based.                   
                    9.   FURTHER ANSWERING the petition, and in sup-                  
               port of the determination that part of the underpay-                   
               ments of tax required to be shown on the petitioners'                  
               income tax returns for the taxable years 1983, 1984,                   
               1985 * * * are due to fraud on the part of Petitioner                  
               Ferdinand DeCaprio, the respondent alleges:                            
                         (a)  On December 20, 1989, petitioner                        
               Ferdinand DeCaprio appeared before Judge Gerard L.                     
               Goettel, District Court Judge, Southern District of New                
               York, and pled guilty to evading income taxes in the                   
               taxable year 1983.                                                     
                         (b)  On that same date, Petitioner Ferdinand                 
               DeCaprio allocuted, under penalty of perjury or false                  
               statement, that during the taxable years 1983 through                  
               1986, he was the owner of two businesses, All Conserva-                
               tion, Inc. and Nationwise Exterminating and Deodoriz-                  
               ing, Inc., which were engaged in pest control and                      
               extermination.                                                         
                         (c)  On that same date, petitioner Ferdinand                 
               DeCaprio allocuted, under penalty of perjury or false                  
               statement, that during the taxable years 1983 through                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011