- 8 -
plea.
(b) Deny and allege that Mr. DeCaprio did
not have the requisite mental state to comprehend the
meaning and import of any questions posed or answers
giving [sic] concerning these issues.
(c) Deny and allege that Mr. DeCaprio did
not have the requisite mental state to comprehend the
meaning and import of the questions posed and answers
provided concerning these issues.
(d) Deny and allege that Mr. DeCaprio did
not have the requisite mental state to comprehend the
meaning and import of the questions posed and answers
provided concerning these issues.
(e) Deny and allege that Mr. DeCaprio did
not have the requisite mental state to comprehend the
meaning and import of the questions posed and answers
provided concerning these issues.
(f) Deny and allege that Mr. DeCaprio did
not have the requisite mental state to comprehend the
meaning and import of the questions posed and answers
provided concerning these issues.
(g) Deny and allege that Mr. DeCaprio did
not have the requisite mental state to comprehend the
meaning and import of the questions posed and answers
provided concerning these issues.
(h) Deny.
(i) Deny.
(j) Deny.
(k) Deny.
(l) Deny.
In respondent's motion, respondent represents, inter alia,
that (1) around sometime after November 3, 1995, and prior to May
10, 1996, petitioner's then counsel John J. Tigue, Jr. (Mr.
Tigue) held a conference with respondent's appeals officer
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011