- 16 - for its performance, it has been held to create a condition subsequent". Tizard v. Eldridge, 25 N.J. Super. at 481, 96 A.2d at 691. Respondent also points out that Patricia Low acted as if she were the sole owner of the agency after decedent's death; she signed S corporation tax returns listing herself as the 100- percent owner of agency stock and reported the corresponding income or loss on her individual Federal income tax returns. These actions indicate that Patricia Low believed she had inherited the stock and had accepted the bequest, despite her testimony to the contrary at trial. Petitioner argues that the stock bequest was subject to a condition precedent; if the monthly payments were not made by Patricia Low, then the condition would fail, and the stock would pass under the residuary clause to her father. Under New Jersey law, gifts subject to a condition precedent do not vest until the condition is met. Tizard v. Eldredge, supra. Under petitioner's reasoning, since it is undisputed that Patricia Low did not make the payments, the stock would pass directly from decedent's estate to the surviving spouse and thus qualify for the marital deduction. Petitioner argues that even if the will is interpreted as giving the stock to Patricia Low subject to a charge to make monthly payments, the surviving spouse still inherited something at decedent's death; namely, the right to either a stream of payments or the stock. This right, accordingPage: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011