- 2 - related penalty under section 6662(a) in the amounts of $15,672 and $11,967, respectively. The issues remaining for decision are: (1) Is petitioner entitled for 1991 to a charitable con- tribution deduction under section 170(a) for a flight helmet that he donated to a museum during that year? We hold that he is entitled to a deduction in the amount of $500. (2) Is petitioner liable for 1991 for self-employment tax? We hold that he is. (3) Is petitioner liable for 1991 for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a)? We hold that he is. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. Petitioner had a mailing address in Arcadia, California, at the time the petition was filed. At all relevant times, petitioner operated a sole proprie- torship that engaged in the business of distributing plumbing products. In June 1977, in response to a newspaper advertisement by an individual in Downey, California, petitioner purchased for $100 a high-altitude, full-pressure flight helmet made in 1959 that was used by the U.S. Navy and that is known, and hereinafter referred to, as a Mark IV helmet. A Mark IV helmet is not a space helmet and was not at anyPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011