Martin H. Droz - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         

          includes any careless, reckless, or intentional disregard of the            
          Code and the temporary or final regulations issued under the                
          Code.  Sec. 6662(c); sec. 1.6662-3(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.                  
               The accuracy-related penalty under 6662(a) does not apply to           
          any portion of an underpayment if it is shown that there was a              
          reasonable cause for such portion and that the taxpayer acted in            
          good faith with respect to such portion.  Sec. 6664(c)(1).  The             
          determination of whether the taxpayer acted with reasonable cause           
          and in good faith depends upon the pertinent facts and circum-              
          stances.  Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  Factors taken              
          into account include the taxpayer's efforts to assess his or her            
          proper tax liability and the knowledge and experience of the                
          taxpayer.  Id.  Reliance on the advice of a professional, such as           
          an accountant or an appraiser, does not necessarily demonstrate             
          reasonable cause and good faith unless, under all the circumstan-           
          ces, such reliance was reasonable and the taxpayer acted in good            
          faith.  Id.                                                                 
               Although petitioner's argument is not entirely clear, he               
          appears to contend that he was not negligent in the preparation             
          of his 1991 return because the claimed charitable contribution              
          deduction was based on the advice of his accountant who prepared            
          that return and on the advice of Mr. Hetz who, he claims, pre-              
          pared the report attached to his 1991 return that indicated that            
          the fair market value of the Mark IV helmet that was the subject            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011