Eyefull Incorporated - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
               We do not find the absence of such documentation to be                 
          dispositive.  The fact that petitioner’s books do not reflect the           
          accrual of a liability at the time services were rendered is not            
          necessarily inconsistent with an understanding that the company             
          was obligated to pay for the services.  The amount and timing of            
          the payment were understood to be contingent on business                    
          performance over an indefinite period.  To have made a reasonable           
          estimate of the accrued expense for Mohney’s compensation in the            
          company’s accounts would have been extremely difficult under                
          these circumstances.  Assuming that a business relationship did             
          exist between petitioner and Mohney, plainly it would not have              
          been conducted at arm’s length, and therefore, in general,                  
          documentation of the kind sought by respondent would have served            
          little, if any, useful function.  Where the owner of a closely              
          held corporation takes an active part in managing its business,             
          neglect of formal documentation of the compensation arrangement             
          between them is not uncommon.  In recognition of this fact, our             
          cases have not required formal documentation as a condition for             
          deductibility of executive compensation in the context of a                 
          closely held corporation.  Levenson & Klein, Inc. v.                        
          Commissioner, 67 T.C. 694, 713-714 (1977); Reub Isaacs & Co. v.             
          Commissioner, 1 B.T.A. 45, 48 (1924); Pulsar Components Intl.,              
          Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-129; Mad Auto Wrecking, Inc           
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-153.                                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011