Eyefull Incorporated - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
          certified public accountant who had been retained to review tax             
          compliance within the group.                                                
               It was almost certainly not the revenue agent’s inquiries              
          that precipitated Mohney’s decision to collect payment from                 
          petitioners and the other Mohney Group companies he managed.                
          Shindel testified that the decision had already been made by                
          November 1990.  This does not mean that concern about potential             
          liability for the accumulated earnings tax was not a principal              
          reason for Mohney’s decision, however.  Shindel also testified              
          that he had become aware of the accumulated earnings tax problem            
          in regard to a number of Mohney Group companies before the IRS              
          audit began, and that he discussed the problem with Mohney.  The            
          sheer number of companies making payments and the size of the               
          amounts paid to Mohney in 1991 relative to prior years supports             
          the inference that the 1991 payments marked a departure from                
          Mohney’s usual policy of collecting payment only as, and to the             
          extent that, the financial situation of each company permitted.             
          Yet even if concern over accumulated earnings tax liability was             
          indeed the principal motivation for Mohney’s decision, this fact            
          would be no less consistent with characterization of the payment            
          as compensation for prior services than with characterization of            
          the payment as a disguised dividend.  In the absence of                     
          documentation establishing an amount of compensation owed to                
          Mohney for his services, Mohney would have had reason to be                 
          concerned about petitioner’s ability to justify accumulations to            




Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011