Eyefull Incorporated - Page 23

                                       - 23 -                                         
               Remodeling work began in October 1991.  In November county             
          officials closed petitioner’s complex because the remodeling had            
          been undertaken without a permit.  The work was allowed to resume           
          in January 1992 on the condition that most of it be redone in               
          accordance with county specifications.  Remodeling was completed,           
          and petitioner reopened in the following month.                             
               The need for parking space was only one of the reasons that            
          petitioner’s management looked for real estate during the years             
          at issue.  Hagerman was always interested in opportunities to               
          expand the adult entertainment business to new locations.  In the           
          spring of 1989 Hagerman negotiated for the purchase of a nearby             
          video store for a price of $163,000.  In a letter to her attorney           
          dated April 10, 1989, she explained her intentions:  “This                  
          purchase should be in my name I think.  Maybe we will get a                 
          corporation later.  What do you think?  I plan to have a                    
          partner.”  A draft sale agreement dated May 1989 records the                
          purchaser as “Platinum Paradise, Inc., a California Corporation             
          to be formed.”  Hagerman discussed a number of potential                    
          acquisitions with Mohney and made some inquiries.  At Mohney’s              
          suggestion, in 1991 she traveled to Melbourne, Australia, to look           
          at a brothel advertised in the Wall Street Journal.  At one time            
          Mohney identified a chicken ranch in Nevada, and at another a               
          golf course in Mexico.  Petitioner reported no real estate                  
          holdings on Schedule L of its U.S. Corporation Income Tax                   






Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011