Eyefull Incorporated - Page 25

                                       - 25 -                                         
          properties for sale or rent as potential relocation sites.  But             
          there is no evidence of negotiations for specific properties                
          besides the Mira Loma parcel at any time during the years at                
          issue.                                                                      
               On its U.S. Corporation Income Tax Returns, Forms 1120,                
          petitioner reported the following receipts and expenditures for             
          each taxable year:                                                          
   Taxable                                      Depr. NonresidentialDepr.             
   Year Ended      Gross      Legal   Repair    Real Property       Equipment         
   August 31      Receipts    ExpensesExpenses  Improvement Costs    Costs            
   1985       $117,092    $1,014      $6,592    ---                      $12,491      
   1986         192,046    19,174     3,074          ---                 19,036       
   1987         635,823    51,243 12,656      ---    ---                              
   1988     1,483,367    24,501       11,331         ---                 255,358      
   1989       1,780,816    52,951     22,420         ---                 8,332        
   1990       2,157,610    11,306     17,582    $7,125                   34,448       
   1991       2,036,202     4,316     21,394         ---                 17,078       
   1992       1,568,110    14,649     24,823    352,420                  130,523      


               Petitioner made no distributions to its shareholders before            
          TYE 8/31/91.  In that year it distributed $65,000 as a dividend.            
          In the following taxable year it distributed a dividend of                  
          $50,000. During the years at issue petitioner made sizeable loans           
          to other corporations within the Mohney Group.  With the                    
          exception of the loan it made to MIC in order to help finance the           
          acquisition of parking space for the use of petitioner’s patrons,           
          no connection between these loans and petitioner’s business is              
          apparent from the evidence.  Petitioner's loans to affiliates for           
          purposes unrelated to its business totaled at least $50,000 in              







Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011