Andrew Wesley Frank & Joy Mary Frank - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         
          property and those which restore the property to its previous               
          condition.  Id.  We held that expenses for a patio, fence,                  
          gate, floor, tile, window treatments, paneling, light fixtures,             
          bathroom fixtures and wash basins, tile, and a stove added to               
          the value or prolonged the life of the property and were properly           
          capitalized.  Id.  We found that the taxpayer's expenses for                
          painting and cleaning restored the property to its previous                 
          condition and were deductible.  Id.  Here, the installation of              
          the gas range, dishwasher, furnace, heater, garage door, toilet,            
          sheetrock and tile in the bathroom, windows and screens, kitchen            
          cabinet and counters, general carpentry work, termite work and              
          floor refinishing added to the value of the home and must be                
          capitalized.  See id.  The expenses of painting the inside and              
          outside of the property restored the property to its previous               
          condition and are deductible.  Id.                                          
               5.      Whether Petitioners May Deduct Expenses Relating to            
                       the Nebraska Street Property                                   
               Petitioners contend that they may deduct their expenses for            
          the Nebraska Street property.                                               
               Petitioner introduced two receipts from Truck Insurance                
          Exchange for $135.70 and $135.  Both show the same policy and               
          agent number, and are dated February 15, 1992.  Neither receipt             
          indicates the property to which it relates.  Petitioners have not           
          shown that they incurred these expenses for a business purpose.             
               Another receipt was from the Solano County Recorders Office            
          dated March 14, 1991, for a recording fee for a property not                



Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011