Mark Friedman - Page 65

                                       - 65 -                                         
               Petitioners argue that their concessions of the deficiencies           
          preclude imposition of the section 6659 additions to tax.                   
          Petitioners contend that their concessions render any inquiry               
          into the grounds for such deficiencies moot.  Absent such                   
          inquiry, petitioners argue that it cannot be known whether their            
          underpayments were attributable to a valuation overstatement or             
          another discrepancy.  Without a finding that a valuation                    
          overstatement contributed to an underpayment, according to                  
          petitioners, section 6659 cannot apply.  In support of this line            
          of reasoning, petitioners rely heavily upon Heasley v.                      
          Commissioner, 902 F.2d 380 (5th Cir. 1990) and McCrary v.                   
          Commissioner, supra.                                                        
               Petitioners' open-ended concessions do not obviate our                 
          finding that the Partnership transactions lacked economic                   
          substance due to overvaluation of the recyclers.  This is not a             
          situation where we have "to decide difficult valuation questions            
          for no reason other than the application of penalties."  See                
          McCrary v. Commissioner, supra at 854 n.14.  The value of the               
          Sentinel EPE recycler was established in Provizer v.                        
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-177, and stipulated by the parties.           
          As a consequence of the inflated value assigned to the recyclers            
          by the Partnerships, petitioners claimed deductions and credits             
          that resulted in underpayments of tax, and we held that the                 







Page:  Previous  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011