Group Administration Premium Services, Inc., et al. - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         

          Issue 2.  Corporate Payments:  Taxable Corporate Distributions or           
          Nontaxable Loan Repayments                                                  
               (a) Amounts of payments                                                
               After generous allowances by respondent, and respondent's              
          concessions on advertising expenses, see last sentence of note 8            
          supra, the amounts of GAPS’s and JJM’s payments to petitioner or            
          for his benefit were $104,564 and $39,553, respectively.                    
               Petitioners did not present any evidence of the amounts of             
          money and other property that GAPS and JJM paid to petitioner, or           
          on his or his family's behalf.  The Mancusos have not met their             
          burden of proving that respondent’s determinations of the amounts           
          of the corporate payments are incorrect.9                                   
               (b) Loan Repayments or Taxable Distributions                           
               A corporate payment to, or on behalf of, a shareholder is a            
          corporate distribution if it is a payment made with respect to              
          the shareholder’s stock.  Sec. 301(a).  Petitioner contends that            
          the amounts GAPS and JJM paid to him, or paid on his behalf, were           
          nontaxable repayments of loans.                                             
               Whether the GAPS and JJM payments to petitioner were                   
          distributions with respect to their stock or loan repayments                


          9These amounts included respondent's determination that                     
          petitioner received constructive distributions through purported            
          corporate commissions paid to his children by GAPS and JJM.                 
          After testimony by one of his children on this issue, which                 
          seriously undermined his credibility, petitioners conceded this             
          issue at trial.  Petitioners presented no other evidence on the             
          amount of distributions.                                                    




Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011