Group Administration Premium Services, Inc., et al. - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         

          depends, in part, on whether petitioner’s alleged transfers of              
          property to GAPS and JJM in earlier years were loans or                     
          contributions to capital.  The corporate payments cannot be loan            
          repayments if there are no loans to repay.  Whether an advance by           
          a shareholder to a corporation is a loan or a contribution to               
          capital is a question of fact, Georgia-Pac. Corp. v.                        
          Commissioner, 63 T.C. 790, 795 (1975); Magee v. Commissioner,               
          T.C. Memo. 1993-305, and each debt-equity case must be decided on           
          its own facts.  We therefore take a facts and circumstances                 
          approach in deciding whether the payments from petitioner to GAPS           
          and JJM were debt or equity.                                                
               When a shareholder makes an otherwise undocumented transfer            
          of money or property to his corporation, a strong inference                 
          arises that the transfer is a contribution to capital rather than           
          a loan.  Dobkin v. Commissioner, 15 T.C. 31, 33 (1950).                     
          Petitioner bears the burden of proving that he lent the cash and            
          furniture to GAPS and JJM.  Arlington Park Jockey Club v. Sauber,           
          262 F.2d 902, 905 (7th Cir. 1959).  In distinguishing debt from             
          equity, courts have looked through taxpayers' labels to determine           
          whether an advance creates a debtor-creditor relationship.                  
               The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, to which an              
          appeal in this case would lie, said in Commissioner v. Meridian &           
          Thirteenth Realty Co., 132 F.2d 182, 186 (7th Cir. 1942), revg.             
          44 B.T.A. 865 (1941):  "the essential difference between a                  





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011