Jonathan B. Geftman - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         



               Steven M. Kwartin, Martin J. Nash, Michael B. Axman, and               
          William J. Palmer, for petitioner.                                          
               Stephen R. Doroghazi and Kenneth A. Hochman, for respondent.           


                       MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION                        

               LARO, Judge:  Jonathan B. Geftman petitioned the Court to              
          redetermine respondent's determination of a $13,043 deficiency in           
          his 1985 Federal income tax, a $3,261 addition thereto under                
          section 6651(a), and a $754 addition thereto under section                  
          6654(a).1                                                                   
               We must decide:                                                        
               1.   Whether amounts paid to petitioner, as sole beneficiary           
          of a trust, are includable in his 1985 gross income.  We hold               
          that a portion of the amounts is.                                           
               2.   Whether petitioner is liable for an addition to tax               
          under section 6651(a).  We hold that he is.                                 
               3.   Whether petitioner is liable for an addition to tax               
          under section 6654(a).  We hold that he is.                                 


               1 Respondent also determined that petitioner was liable for            
          additions to tax under sec. 6653(a)(1) and (2), but these                   
          additions have been conceded by respondent.                                 
               Petitioner initially disputed only the additions to tax and            
          not the deficiency in tax.  Later, in his amended petition,                 
          petitioner contested the deficiency as well as the additions to             
          tax.                                                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011