- 17 - buy or to sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.” Section 2031(b), in particular, addresses the valuation of stock not listed on an exchange. Courts have long held that, with respect to stock in a closely held corporation, the price term in a restrictive buy- sell or redemption agreement (a restrictive agreement) can fix the value of the stock for Federal estate tax purposes. See May v. McGowan, 194 F.2d 396, 397 (2d Cir. 1952); Lomb v. Sugden, 82 F.2d 166, 167-168 (2d Cir. 1936); Wilson v. Bowers, 57 F.2d 682, 683-684 (2d Cir. 1932). Since the above three cases were decided, the courts have developed a set of requirements for determining whether the price set forth in a restrictive agreement controls for purposes of the Federal estate tax. Recently, we summarized those requirements in Estate of Lauder v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-736: It is axiomatic that the offering price must be fixed and determinable under the agreement. In addition, the agreement must be binding on the parties both during life and after death. Finally, the restrictive agreement must have been entered into for a bona fide business reason and must not be a substitute for a testamentary disposition. * * * [Citations omitted.] Section 20.2031-2(b), Estate Tax Regs., embodies the three elements of the Lauder analysis: Even if the decedent is not free to dispose of the underlying securities at other than the option or contract price, such price will be disregarded in determining the value of the securities unless it is determined under the circumstances of the particular case that the agreement represents a bona fide business arrangement and not a device to pass the decedent’sPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011