Stuart A. and Harriet J. Gollin, et al. - Page 58

                                       - 58 -- 58 -                                        
          Circuit reversed our imposition of the negligence additions to              
          tax.  Petitioners point out that the taxpayer in that case relied           
          in part upon a tax opinion contained in the offering materials.             
               In the present cases, however, petitioners have not shown              
          that they placed substantial reliance upon the tax opinion letter           
          attached to the offering memoranda.  Moreover, the offering                 
          memoranda for the Partnerships herein warned prospective                    
          investors that the accompanying tax opinion letters were not in             
          final form, and were prepared for the general partner, and that             
          prospective investors should consult their own professional                 
          advisers with respect to the tax benefits and tax risks                     
          associated with the Partnerships.  The tax opinion letters                  
          accompanying the SAB Recovery, SAB Recycling, and SAB Reclamation           
          offering memoranda were addressed solely to the general partner             
          and began with the following opening disclaimer:                            
               This opinion is provided to you for your individual                    
               guidance.  We expect that prospective investors will                   
               rely upon their own professional advisors with respect                 
               to all tax issues arising in connection with an                        
               investment in the Partnership and the operations                       
               thereof.  We recognize that you intend to include this                 
               letter with your offering materials and we have                        
               consented to that with the understanding that the                      
               purpose in distributing it is to assist your offerees'                 
               and their tax advisors in making their own analysis and                

          12(...continued)                                                            
          agreed to be bound by the Court's opinion regarding the                     
          application of the additions to tax under sec. 6653(a), inter               
          alia.  Accordingly, although the Court's analysis focused on one            
          taxpayer, the additions to tax were sustained with respect to all           
          of the taxpayers.                                                           





Page:  Previous  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011