Max M. and Joan E. Greenberg - Page 8

                                         -8-                                          
          family residences.  Gradually, the company shifted to junior deeds          
          on larger residential and commercial loans, including hotels,               
          resorts, and undeveloped land in California and Arizona.                    
               Accordingly, in 1990, certain borrowers had not been making            
          their monthly payments; rather than foreclose on the properties or          
          notify the Pioneer Mortgage investors, G. Naiman used new                   
          investors’ money to fund the continued flow of purported interest           
          payments.4  The end result was a financial house of cards dependent         
          on the influx of new investment dollars.  The house of cards could          
          not survive in the long run.                                                
               On January 2, 1992, petitioners filed a civil lawsuit against          
          G. Naiman and other defendants for, among other things, intentional         
          misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, breach of fiduciary              
          duty, and aiding and abetting/conspiracy.5  A jury verdict was              
          rendered in favor of petitioners on April 30, 1993.  The jury also          
          awarded punitive damages.  On May 12, 1994, G. Naiman was indicted          
          in Federal Court on charges of mail fraud and money laundering.  G.         
          Naiman pleaded guilty to a scheme to defraud Pioneer Mortgage               


               4    Newspaper articles portray G. Naiman’s activities as a            
          typical “Ponzi” scheme.  Such a scheme involves a pyramiding                
          technique by which the earlier investors receive their returns              
          from the principal of their own funds and from the principal of             
          later investors.                                                            
               5    Petitioners’ suit was consolidated with some 850 other            
          lawsuits filed by Pioneer Mortgage investors seeking return of              
          investment funds and damages in Mertyle H. Owens Trust v. San               
          Diego Trust & Savings Bank, Consolidated Case No. 633381, in                
          Superior Court of California, County of San Diego.                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011