T.C. Memo. 1996-452 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ROBERT D. GROSSMAN, JR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 20526-90, 14364-91. Filed October 7, 1996. P, a tax attorney, effectively controlled the daily operations of a group of closely held corporations (C). The corporations were owned by P’s wife (W), W’s mother, and W’s brother. In 1983 through 1986, P and W took personal vacation trips, which P caused C to pay for. C’s payments of the personal expenses of P and W were constructive dividends to W. P and W omitted to report these constructive dividends on their 1983 through 1986 joint tax returns. The notices of deficiency for 1983 through 1988 were sent to P and W more than 3 years after P and W filed their joint tax returns for 1983, 1984, and 1985. R contends that many of these omissions for 1983 through 1986 were due to P’s fraud. P denies the omissions, denies fraud, and contends that, if there are deficiencies, then he is entitled to innocent spouse treatment for 1986. 1. Held: The statute of limitations does not bar the assessment and collection of tax for 1985, but is a bar as to 1983 and 1984. Sec. 6501(c)(1), I.R.C. 1954.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011