Robert D. Grossman, Jr. - Page 119

                                       - 62 -                                         
          of these Miami-Key West expenses was paid for by Markette check             
          No. 2162.17                                                                 
               The purpose of this trip was for Betsy and the children to             
          take a personal vacation to Miami during the spring school break.           
          The side trip to Key West was to see Halley’s Comet.  The son was           
          sick, and so he stayed in Miami while the others went to Key                
          West.                                                                       
               Check No. 2162--Miami, Key West, Son.  The American Express            
          April invoice includes charges totaling $827 for three round-trip           
          Eastern Airlines tickets to Miami, to leave Washington, D.C., on            
          April 11, 1986.  The tickets, for petitioner, Betsy, and the son,           
          cost $289, $319, and $219, respectively.  The American Express              
          April invoice also includes charges totaling $352 for three one-            

               17   As shown supra table 14, respondent determined that a             
          net of $1,656.33 ($4,713.94 less $3,057.61) of check No. 2162 was           
          a constructive dividend.  The remaining amount, $3,057.61,                  
          represents $897 of travel expenses and $2,160.61 in connection              
          with a computer; respondent later concluded that the computer was           
          not paid for by check No. 2162.  Respondent has not identified              
          which travel expenses are included in the $897 that was allowed.            
          Also, respondent has not asked for an increased deficiency, or              
          otherwise acted, with regard to the $2,160.61 computer expense              
          that was allowed.                                                           
               As we noted in the next-to-last paragraph of supra Check               
          Nos. 2137, 2148, and 2203--Miami, Markette received a $399 credit           
          on its American Express April invoice.  Markette used this credit           
          to pay charges appearing on this invoice, and paid the balance by           
          its check No. 2162.  See infra table 12.  For purposes of                   
          determining whether Markette paid for an item, and whether that             
          payment constitutes a constructive dividend, it does not make any           
          difference whether Markette’s payment was accomplished by                   
          applying the credit or by check No. 2162.  For convenience in our           
          findings we shall refer to all the payments of April invoice                
          items as being accomplished by check No. 2162.                              




Page:  Previous  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011