Jack A. and Nancy R. Haigh - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          Federal income taxes in the amounts of $2,539, $5,284, and                  
          $9,476, respectively.  The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether            
          Jack A. Haigh is entitled to Schedule F expense deductions in               
          excess of those allowed by respondent for each of the years in              
          issue, and (2) whether petitioners are entitled to net operating            
          loss carryovers in the amounts of $16,460, $2,567, and $3,851,              
          for 1991, 1992, and 1993, respectively.                                     
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the exhibits attached thereto are              
          incorporated herein by this reference.  During the years in                 
          issue, petitioners were husband and wife and filed joint Federal            
          income tax returns.  At the time the petition was filed,                    
          petitioners resided in Winter Park, Florida.  References to                 
          petitioner are to Jack A. Haigh.2                                           
               During the years in issue petitioners resided in Winter                
          Park, Florida.  Petitioner was born in 1928.  He had been                   
          employed by the U.S. Department of the Navy as a computer                   
          specialist but had retired at some point prior to the years in              
          issue.                                                                      
               The disputed issues in this case involve a 300 acre farm               
          located on the banks of the Red River, 23 miles east of Durant,             


          2Nancy R. Haigh did not appear at trial or sign the                         
          stipulation of facts.  The case was dismissed as to her for                 
          failure properly to prosecute.  A decision will be entered                  
          against her consistent with the decision entered against Jack A.            
          Haigh.                                                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011