- 4 - totaling $55,369, $53,376, and $49,495, respectively. Specifically, the Schedules F reflected the following: 1991 1992 1993 Part II--Farm Expenses Chemicals $1,467 $1,540 $1,815 Custom hire (machine work) 4,335 4,110 3,765 Depreciation 3,780 2,980 3,028 Fertilizers and lime 6,238 5,750 4,872 Freight and trucking 2,150 1,863 1,605 Gasoline, fuel, and oil 4,610 4,974 3,840 Insurance (other than health) 3,375 3,980 3,980 Interest: (b) Other 4,135 3,318 3,648 Labor hired (less jobs credit) 3,498 2,514 2,690 Repairs and maintenance 5,854 7,579 5,173 Seeds and plants purchased 6,775 6,315 5,155 Storage and warehousing 1,200 1,200 1,200 Supplies purchased 1,992 1,655 2,140 Taxes 726 810 840 Utilities 1,241 905 1,892 Other expenses 3,993 3,883 3,852 Total expenses 55,369 53,376 49,495 Net loss 54,409 52,161 48,395 Respondent allowed expenses to the extent of petitioner's reported Schedule F income for each year in issue. Respondent disallowed the remaining deductions claimed on the ground that petitioner failed to establish that the expenses were ordinary and necessary within the meaning of section 162 and for lack of substantiation. Respondent's determinations, having been made in a notice of deficiency, are presumed correct, and petitioner bears the burden of proving such determinations to be erroneous. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Furthermore,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011