Wilburn C. Hall, Jr. - Page 44

                                       - 44 -                                         
        We hold for respondent on this issue, except that we hold                     
        for petitioner as to $16 for 1985.                                            

        C. Royalty Income--198311 Through 1986                                        
        Petitioner contends that he reported all income that was                      
        known to him, and that he had no income other than what he                    
        reported on his tax returns for the years in issue.                           
        Respondent contends that petitioner received and failed to                    
        report royalty income in the amounts of $30,870 for 1983, $29,596             
        for 1984, $2,313 for 1985, and $13,230 for 1986.                              
        We agree with respondent as to 1983, 1984, and 1986; we                       
        agree with petitioner as to 1985.                                             
        (1) 1984 and 1986                                                             
        Forms 1099 reporting royalty income distributed to                            
        petitioner were issued to petitioner for 1984 by seven payors and             
        for 1986 by five payors. Petitioner has not challenged the                    
        accuracy of these forms.                                                      
        The Form 1099 information matches respondent's royalty                        
        determinations in the notice of deficiency for 1984 and 1986,                 
        except for $6,408 withholding as to 1984. See note 1 to table 6,              
        supra. Respondent determined that Phillips Petroleum Co. paid                 
        $32,213 royalty income to petitioner in 1984. This matches the                

               11On brief, respondent conceded the $10,329 royalty income             
          adjustment for 1982 ($24,647 royalty income determined, less                
          $14,318 royalty income reported) because "Any underreported                 
          royalty income for 1982 would have been included in the                     
          adjustment * * * based on the source and application of funds               
          calculation."  See our discussion of this matter supra in the               
          text following note 9 reference.                                            


Page:  Previous  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011