- 17 -- 17 - limited information that the revenue agent was able to obtain with respect to certain of those deposits, that agent excluded from the calculation of petitioners' unreported income for those years those deposits that that agent concluded were not taxable (e.g., credit card advances) or that that agent concluded had been reported by petitioners in Schedules C of their 1989 and 1990 returns.8 In the notice of deficiency (notice), respondent determined that deposits into petitioners' accounts during the years 1989 and 1990 in the amounts of $817,214 and $319,904, respectively, constitute unreported income. The notice further stated in pertinent part: It is determined that the taxpayer received gross income from real estate sales of a general contracting business for the tax years 1989 and 1990 which was not reported on the returns. The gross income amounts have been reconstructed according to the information avail- able, including information from the Washington County 8 By way of illustration, in reconstructing petitioners' income for the years at issue on the basis of the bank deposits method, the revenue agent excluded from the calculation of petitioners' unreported income for those years the following deposits into petitioners' account at Washington Federal that that agent con- cluded were deposits of amounts that were paid to petitioner in connection with the sales of certain real properties that had been reported in Schedules C of petitioners' 1989 and 1990 re- turns: Date of Amount of Deposit Deposit Jan. 17, 1989 $6,970.84 Feb. 22, 1989 15,608.58 May 3, 1989 14,747.67 June 1, 1989 10,794.10 Apr. 3, 1990 46,056.93Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011