- 18 -- 18 - records and information concerning deposits to the bank accounts controlled by the taxpayer. The taxpayer received gross income in the amounts of $ 1,282,614.00 and $ 515,204.00 rather than gross income from con- tracting of $ 465,400.00 and $ 195,300.00 as reported on the returns for the tax years 1989 and 1990 respec- tively. It is further determined that the gross income is self-employment income and thus subject to the self- employment tax for the tax years 1989 and 1990. OPINION Before the trial herein had commenced but after the Court had received and reviewed the document entitled "Stipulation of Facts" and the exhibits attached thereto that the parties had filed with the Court, the Court expressed its concern to the parties about whether the record was clear as to (1) the conces- sions, if any, made by the parties after the notice was issued and (2) the amounts of the deposits that remained in dispute as of the commencement of trial. The Court directed the parties to supplement their stipulation of facts in order to clarify those matters, and the parties filed a document entitled "Supplemental Stipulation of Facts". (We shall refer to both the stipulation of facts and the supplemental stipulation of facts as stipula- tions.) Upon review of the entire record in this case, we have found certain errors in the stipulations and the briefs as to the amounts of deposits into petitioners' accounts during 1989 and 1990 that remain in dispute. Consequently, we are not bound by those errors in the stipulations, see Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 181, 195 (1989), and in the briefs.Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011