Charles R. Harp and April B. Harp - Page 18

                                                                               - 18 -- 18 -                                                                                
                              records and information concerning deposits to the bank                                                                                      
                              accounts controlled by the taxpayer.  The taxpayer                                                                                           
                              received gross income in the amounts of $ 1,282,614.00                                                                                       
                              and $ 515,204.00 rather than gross income from con-                                                                                          
                              tracting of $ 465,400.00 and $ 195,300.00 as reported                                                                                        
                              on the returns for the tax years 1989 and 1990 respec-                                                                                       
                              tively.  It is further determined that the gross income                                                                                      
                              is self-employment income and thus subject to the self-                                                                                      
                              employment tax for the tax years 1989 and 1990.                                                                                              
                                                                              OPINION                                                                                      
                              Before the trial herein had commenced but after the Court                                                                                    
                    had received and reviewed the document entitled "Stipulation of                                                                                        
                    Facts" and the exhibits attached thereto that the parties had                                                                                          
                    filed with the Court, the Court expressed its concern to the                                                                                           
                    parties about whether the record was clear as to (1) the conces-                                                                                       
                    sions, if any, made by the parties after the notice was issued                                                                                         
                    and (2) the amounts of the deposits that remained in dispute as                                                                                        
                    of the commencement of trial.  The Court directed the parties to                                                                                       
                    supplement their stipulation of facts in order to clarify those                                                                                        
                    matters, and the parties filed a document entitled "Supplemental                                                                                       
                    Stipulation of Facts".  (We shall refer to both the stipulation                                                                                        
                    of facts and the supplemental stipulation of facts as stipula-                                                                                         
                    tions.)                                                                                                                                                
                              Upon review of the entire record in this case, we have found                                                                                 
                    certain errors in the stipulations and the briefs as to the                                                                                            
                    amounts of deposits into petitioners' accounts during 1989 and                                                                                         
                    1990 that remain in dispute.  Consequently, we are not bound by                                                                                        
                    those errors in the stipulations, see Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. v.                                                                                         
                    Commissioner, 93 T.C. 181, 195 (1989), and in the briefs.                                                                                              




Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011