Michael J. Heckler, a.k.a. Michael Vonheckler and Charlotte A. Miska - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         

               On September 20, 1996, petitioner filed a response to                  
          respondent's objection.  Petitioner contends that respondent                
          erroneously assessed interest computed at the increased rate                
          prescribed in section 6621(c) on the ground that it violates--              
               the stipulation of Docket # 11547-90, paragraph (g),                   
               which waived the restriction of assessment for the                     
               TEFRA partnership, paragraph (f), and invokes the                      
               suspension of interest per I.R.C. 6601(c).                             
               On October 15, 1996, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss              
          for Lack of Jurisdiction and to Strike the Claims Relating to the           
          Increased Interest Pursuant to Former I.R.C. Section 6621(c),               
          along with a supporting memorandum.  Specifically, relying on               
          White v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 209 (1990), and Odend'hal v.                 
          Commissioner, 95 T.C. 617 (1990), respondent contends that, in a            
          case based upon an affected items notice of deficiency which                
          pertains solely to additions to tax, this Court lacks the                   
          authority, in the exercise of its jurisdiction to redetermine a             
          deficiency, to consider a taxpayer's liability for interest                 
          computed at the increased rate prescribed in section 6621(c).               
          Respondent further contends that petitioners have not overpaid              
          the interest in dispute (whether such interest is computed at the           
          normal rate prescribed in section 6621(a)(2) or the increased               
          rate prescribed in section 6621(c)), and, therefore, the Court              
          lacks jurisdiction to determine an overpayment under section                
          6512(b).  See Barton v. Commissioner, supra; Greene v.                      
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-105.  In support of the latter                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011