- 11 - reviewed in partnership level proceedings. N.C.F. Energy Partners v. Commissioner, supra at 745. However, as explained in White v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. at 212-214, an individual partner's liability for section 6621(c) interest normally cannot be raised in a so-called affected items proceeding. In White, the Commissioner issued a notice of deficiency to the taxpayers solely for additions to tax after the underlying tax deficiency was assessed as a computational adjustment following the conclusion of partnership level proceedings. When the taxpayers filed a petition contesting the additions to tax as well as their liability for additional interest under section 6621(c), the Commissioner responded by filing a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction as to the additional interest. In granting the Commissioner's motion to dismiss in White, we first held, based upon a combined reading of sections 6211(a), 6230(a), and 6601(e)(1), that interest computed at the increased rate prescribed in section 6621(c)(1) is not a deficiency within the meaning of section 6211(a). Consistent with this holding, we rejected the taxpayers' argument that section 6230(a)(2)(A)(i) provides statutory authority for this Court to redetermine such interest. Next, we analyzed section 6621(c)(4) and concluded that our jurisdiction under that provision is limited to determining only the portion of a deficiency in tax imposed underPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011