- 4 - The issue for decision is whether petitioner is entitled to an ordinary loss as a result of his investment in Geotech. Petitioner presents three arguments in support of his claim that he is entitled to an $18,750 loss resulting from his purchase of a 1/4 percent overriding royalty interest in any oil or gas produced on the Rio Blanco lease. (1) Section 1244 stock Petitioner alleges that, after Geotech decided not to drill on the Rio Blanco lease, he asked Geotech for a transfer of his interest to another lease, or his money back. He testified that Geotech then made him a general partner in Royalty Partners. He further alleges that Royalty Partners successfully drilled a well, and that he received three "dividend" checks from Royalty Partners but that a problem developed with the wells and he received no more money from the operation. Petitioner next informs us that he asked Geotech to issue to him founder's stock in Geotech but that he never received any shares in Geotech. In his Trial Memorandum, petitioner states: When I asked for stock in the corporation I asked for founder's (1244) stock. I do not have the stock, but it was promised to me by oral agreement. * * * Geotech met all of the qualifications of a small business corporation. I believe that the substance, if not the form of this agreement justifies my deduction as a 1244 stock loss. (2) Passive activity loss under section 469-1T, Income Tax Regs., 53 Fed. Reg. 5700 (Feb. 25, 1988) Again, in his Trial Memorandum, petitioner states:Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011