Inverworld, Inc., et al. - Page 105

                                                - 186 -                                                   
                  Notwithstanding section 861(a)(1) and the regulations                                   
            thereunder, however, certain interest is treated as income from                               
            sources without the United States.  Sec. 1.861-2(b), Income Tax                               
            Regs.  Interest received by a nonresident alien individual or a                               
            foreign corporation on "deposits with persons carrying on the                                 
            banking business" is not treated as income from sources within                                
            the United States, if such interest is not effectively connected                              
            with the conduct of trade or business within the United States.                               
            Sec. 861(a)(1)(A), (c)(1).                                                                    
                  As we have stated supra p. 167, the Code and the regulations                            
            do not define "deposits" for purposes of section 861(c).  The                                 
            Commissioner, however, has interpreted the term "deposits" to                                 
            include, for purposes of section 861(c), "time certificates of                                
            deposit, open account time deposits, and multiple maturity time                               
            deposits, all of which are interest bearing."  Rev. Rul. 72-104,                              
            1972-1 C.B. 209, 209.  We agree with the reasoning of Rev. Rul.                               
            72-104, and we apply that reasoning in our interpretation of the                              
            term "deposits" in section 861(c)(1).26  Accordingly, we conclude                             

            26                                                                                            
                  A revenue ruling is entitled to no special deference.                                   
            Higgins v. Commissioner, 312 U.S. 212, 215 (1941); Helvering v.                               
            New York Trust, 292 U.S. 455 (1934); Stark v. Commissioner, 86                                
            T.C. 243, 250-251 (1986).  The Court of Appeals for the Fifth                                 
            Circuit has stated:                                                                           
                  a [revenue] ruling is merely the opinion of a lawyer in                                 
                  the agency and must be accepted as such.  It may be                                     
                  helpful in interpreting a statute, but it is not                                        
                  binding on the Secretary [of the Treasury] or the                                       
                  courts.  It does not have the effect of a regulation or                                 
                  a Treasury Decision.  * * *  [Stubbs, Overbeck &                                        
                  Associates v. United States, 445 F.2d 1142, 1146-1147                                   
                                                                            (continued...)                



Page:  Previous  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011