Leon M. and Mary K. Jaroff - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          interest under section 6621(c).  We consider the amounts in                 
          dispute in docket No. 27392-89 to be adjusted accordingly. For              
          each of these consolidated cases, the parties filed a Stipulation           
          of Settled Issues concerning the adjustments relating to                    
          petitioners' participation in the Plastics Recycling Program.               
          The stipulations provide:                                                   
               1.  Petitioners are not entitled to any deductions,                    
               losses, investment credits, business energy investment                 
               credits or any other tax benefits claimed on their tax                 
               returns as a result of their participation in the                      
               Plastics Recycling Program.                                            
               2.  The underpayments in income tax attributable to                    
               petitioners' participation in the Plastics Recycling                   
               Program are substantial underpayments attributable to                  
               tax motivated transactions, subject to the increased                   
               rate of interest established under I.R.C. �6621(c),                    
               formerly �6621(d).                                                     
               3.  This stipulation resolves all issues that relate to                
               the items claimed on petitioners' tax returns resulting                
               from their participation in the Plastics Recycling                     
               Program, with the exception of petitioners' potential                  
               liability for additions to the tax for valuation                       
               overstatements under I.R.C. �6659 and for negligence                   
               under the applicable provisions of �6653(a).                           
               4.  With respect to the issue of the addition to the                   
               tax under I.R.C. �6659, Petitioners do not intend to                   
               contest the value of the Sentinel Recycler or the                      
               existence of a valuation overstatement on the                          
               Petitioners' returns; however, Petitioners reserve                     
               their right to argue that the underpayment in tax is                   
               not attributable to a valuation overstatement within                   
               the meaning of I.R.C. �6659(a)(1), and that the                        
               Secretary should have waived the addition to tax                       
               pursuant to the provisions of I.R.C. �6659(e).                         
               Long after the trial of these consolidated cases, on                   
          September 18, 1995, petitioners filed a Motion For Leave To File            
          Motion For Decision Ordering Relief From the Negligence Penalty             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011