6 Code Ann. sec. 3.1 (Michie 1994), is substantially the same as the North Carolina fertilizer law for purposes of this case. In 1990 and 1991, WSC paid $43,809 and $44,876, respectively, to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture pursuant to the assessment of penalties for violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. sec. 106-665. In 1991, WSC paid $2,057 to the Virginia Department of Agriculture pursuant to the assessment of penalties for violation of an analogous provision of the Virginia fertilizer law. The relevant portions of N.C. Gen. Stat. sec. 106-665 may be summarized as follows: (a) When making an administrative determination as to whether a fertilizer is deficient in plant food, the commissioner of agriculture (commissioner) shall be guided solely by the official sample taken by an authorized agent and in the manner prescribed by statute; (b) if the analysis shows that any commercial fertilizer falls short of the guaranteed nitrogen, phosphate, or potash, then a penalty of three times the value of the deficiency shall be assessed if the deficiency exceeds the investigational allowance; and (c) all penalties assessed under N.C. Gen. Stat. sec. 106- 665 shall be paid to the consumer of the lot of fertilizer; if the consumer cannot be found, the amount of the penalty assessed shall be paid to the commissioner, who shall deposit the samePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011