Estate of Robert G. Kluener, Deceased, Donald E. Hathaway, Co-executor and Charlotte J. Kluener - Page 32

            are compelled to the conclusion that, in substance, Mr. Kluener                               
            sold the horses using APECO as a conduit for the passage of title                             
            and receipt of the proceeds.  Consequently, we hold that                                      
            petitioners are liable for the tax payable on the gain realized                               
            from the sales.                                                                               
                  Having concluded that the transaction in issue is properly                              
            viewed as a sale by Mr. Kluener using APECO as a conduit, we need                             
            not address respondent's contention that the gain from the sale                               
            of the horses should be allocated, pursuant to section 482, to                                
            Mr. Kluener in order to clearly reflect the income of both                                    
            himself and APECO.  We note, however, that we have previously                                 
            stated that, if the conduit analysis of Commissioner v. Court                                 
            Holding Co., 324 U.S. at 334, and its progeny applies to a                                    
            transaction, all prerequisites for application of section 482 are                             
            likewise met.  Southern Bancorporation v. Commissioner, 67 T.C.                               
            1022, 1026 (1977).                                                                            
                  We next consider whether petitioners are liable for the                                 
            penalty provided by section 6662(a) for substantial                                           
            understatement of income tax.  Respondent determined that the                                 
            penalty applied to the underpayment of tax resulting from the                                 
            omission from Mr. and Ms. Kluener's 1989 return of the capital                                
            gain and section 1245 recapture income realized upon the sales of                             
            the horses that occurred during that year.  Petitioners bear the                              
            burden of establishing error in respondent's determination.  Rule                             
            142(a).                                                                                       






Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011