Jack J. Kramer - Page 40

                                                 - 40 -                                                   
                  (ii) Participation in illegal activities                                                
                  The Court has repeatedly found that illegal activity                                    
            strongly indicates the presence of fraud even when the taxpayer                               
            has not been criminally convicted.  Clayton v. Commissioner, 102                              
            T.C. 632, 647 (1994) (citing Bradford v. Commissioner, supra at                               
            307-308) (ample evidence found of illegal activity based on                                   
            taxpayer's engaging in illegal bookmaking, even though charges                                
            against him were dropped)); see also  Meier v. Commissioner, 91                               
            T.C. 273, 302-303 (1988); Deletis v Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                                  
            1995-512 (engaging in theft and concealment of that fact from his                             
            employer and failing to report the income derived is a course of                              
            conduct upon which the Court based its finding that the taxpayer                              
            acted fraudulently).                                                                          
                  The evidence of illegal activity in this case is even more                              
            compelling than in Clayton because petitioner was convicted of                                
            money laundering.  Petitioner funneled the proceeds from the card                             
            club investment into the Apache enterprises, some of it through                               
            his own bank accounts.  He also tried to recover the $12 million                              
            investment in the card club.  Petitioner admitted that his                                    
            sources of income, at least in part, were those illegal                                       
            activities for both 1986 and 1987.  He produced no evidence to                                
            show that his sources of income for either year were anything                                 
            other than criminal activity.  SGA, controlled by Sam Gilbert,                                
            paid petitioner's "wages" in 1985 and 1986 as a conduit for                                   
            returning laundered money to the Kramers.                                                     




Page:  Previous  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011