Daniel R. Leavell and Eva Lovene Leavell - Page 18

                                                 - 18 -                                                   
            cashier's checks, petitioners obtained cash necessary to make                                 
            cash purchases.  Petitioners, however, have submitted no receipts                             
            reflecting the alleged cash purchases.  With regard to a claimed                              
            purchase of $260,000 from one Ralph Bassett, a bill of sale                                   
            establishes that the purchase was for only $130,000.                                          
                  Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of proof, and                              
             respondent's determinations of the ending inventory, purchases,                              
             and cost-of-goods sold of L & L Supply are sustained for each                                
             year in issue.  Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, supra at 115;                               
             Cheesman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-509.                                               

                    Claimed $200,810 NOL Re:  Sales & Servicing Business                                  
                  For 7 months in 1985, Daniel operated a business that sold                              
             repair parts for and that made repairs to oil field drilling                                 
             equipment.                                                                                   
                  On a Schedule C attached to petitioners' 1985 joint Federal                             
             income tax return, Daniel claimed a net operating loss of                                    
             $200,810 relating to this business.  On the Schedule C, Daniel                               
             indicated that the expenses claimed were estimates.  At trial,                               
             Daniel testified that the $711,055 cost-of-goods sold claimed                                
             on this 1985 Schedule C was estimated based on seven-twelfths                                
             of total purchases and seven-twelfths of 1984 labor costs for                                
             this business.  On this same Schedule C for 1985, however,                                   
             Daniel also claimed a separate and additional $156,392 expense                               







Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011