- 6 - generally, Billingsley v. Commissioner, 868 F.2d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir. 1989), revg. an unpublished order; Toscano v. Commissioner, 441 F.2d 930, 934 (9th Cir. 1971), vacating and remanding 52 T.C. 295 (1969); Brannon's of Shawnee, Inc. v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 999, 1002 (1978). Ms. Levin contends and testified that she did not authorize Mr. Levin to execute the power of attorney in favor of Anson, did not authorize Anson to extend the period of limitations, did not authorize Gelfand or anyone to file a petition on her behalf, and did not agree to the settlement of this case or authorize anyone to do so on her behalf. She recounts a series of grievances against Mr. Levin over most of their 30-year marriage. Mr. Levin testified pursuant to subpoena served by respondent and denied many of Ms. Levin's accusations. He testified that he showed her or told her about all material correspondence involving the Schulman matter and that she authorized him to sign her name to the power of attorney and stipulation. Ms. Levin attacks Mr. Levin's credibility. She disputes his claimed lack of recollection of 1975 divorce proceedings. She argues that his apparent simulation of her signature refutes his claim of authority, asserting that, if he were truly authorized, he would not have found it necessary to make the signature look like hers.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011