- 6 -
sentence) and the fourth sentence were different. The pertinent
third and fourth sentences of that early draft read:
After the divorce, the beneficiaries of said policies
will be changed to the children, provided however that
Mr. Lineweaver has the right to designate someone other
than the children as beneficiaries of policies
providing regular coverage (as opposed to double
indemnity) of up to $100,000.00. Mr. Lineweaver, after
all the children have reached the age of eighteen (18)
years, may make whomever he wishes the beneficiaries of
any or all of his life insurance.
Kathleen wanted to remain a beneficiary after the divorce until
she remarried and also wanted the children to remain
beneficiaries until they reached age 21. In a later draft the
following third and fourth sentences appeared:
After the divorce, Mrs. Lineweaver shall, until she
remarries, remain the beneficiary of life insurance
policies providing regular coverage (as opposed to
double indemnity) in an amount of up to $100,000.00,
with the beneficiaries of the remaining life insurance
policies being the children. Mr. Lineweaver, after all
the children have reached the age of twenty-one (21)
years, and Mrs. Lineweaver has remarried, may make
whomever he wishes the beneficiaries of any or all of
his life insurance.
In the final version of the "After the divorce" sentence, the
version the spouses ultimately executed, the "up to $100,000.00"
language in regard to Kathleen's interest was changed to "not
less than $100,000.00". In the final version the proviso in
regard to Mr. Lineweaver's naming beneficiaries other than the
children for insurance up to $100,000, which had appeared in the
third sentence of the earlier draft, was added to the end of the
new third sentence. The fourth sentence remained the same in
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011