- 18 -
time he executed his 1982 will, decedent was clearly under a
legal obligation to retain Kathleen as a beneficiary on his life
insurance in an amount of at least $100,000, since the spouses
were not then divorced and Kathleen had of course not remarried.
The 1982 will directs decedent's executor "to carry out those
obligations of mine set forth in the aforementioned Deed of
Separation which survive my death." No such language appears in
Article IV of the 1984 and 1987 wills. The 1984 and 1987 wills
make no reference to any event terminating decedent's obligation,
yet, it is clear that once both conditions were met, decedent
would no longer have any such obligation under the Deed of
Separation. Mr. Johnson, the attorney who drafted the 1984 and
1987 wills, failed to consult the Deed of Separation and, if he
knew about the divorce and Kathleen's remarriage, he failed to
consider the effect of Kathleen's remarriage when drafting those
later wills. Mr. Johnson was wholly unfamiliar with the terms of
the Deed of Separation; he simply accepted decedent's
representation that the 1982 will mirrored the terms of the Deed
of Separation and that decedent did not want any changes in
Article IV of the will except a few minor word changes which Mr.
Johnson made. The Court accepts that the 1982 will did mirror
decedent's obligation under the Deed of Separation at the time
that will was executed; however neither Mr. Johnson nor decedent
seems to have considered the fact that in the intervening period
there had ensued a divorce and Kathleen's remarriage. In any
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011