Richard A. and Carol B. Little - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          492-493 (1968).  However, if the new position requires the                  
          taxpayer to present different evidence, it is new matter, and the           
          Commissioner bears the burden of proof.  Achiro v. Commissioner,            
          77 T.C. 881, 890 (1981); Estate of Falese v. Commissioner, 58               
          T.C. 895, 899-900 (1972).                                                   
               2.   Notice of Deficiency                                              
               Petitioners deducted $727,600 for worthless Dondi Financial            
          stock in 1987 and $199,600 for worthless Texana Capital stock in            
          1988.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed                   
          $618,460 of petitioners' deduction for 1987 and all of their                
          deduction for 1988.  Respondent determined that petitioners "did            
          not establish that the amount shown, i.e. $618,460 and $199,600             
          was (a) a loss, and (b) sustained by you".  The notice of                   
          deficiency also included the following calculation:                         
               1987                                 1988                              
          Purchase cost      $727,600       Purchase cost      $199,600               
          Less cash paid      109,140       Payments verified         0               
          Adjustment          618,460       Adjustment          199,600               
               3.   Amendment to Answer                                               
               In the petition, petitioners contended that respondent erred           
          in disallowing the worthless stock deductions.  In the answer,              
          respondent denied that respondent's determination was in error.             
          About 11 months later and 14 days before trial, respondent moved            
          to amend the answer and lodged an amended answer.  We granted               
          respondent's motion.                                                        






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011