Rusty K. London, f.k.a. Irving London - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent filed a motion for partial summary judgment in              
          which she asserts that petitioner is not entitled to use income             
          averaging for the taxable years 1980 and 1981.  Petitioner filed            
          an objection to respondent's motion and also filed a cross-motion           
          for partial summary judgment.  Petitioner argues that he is                 
          entitled to income averaging for the taxable years 1980 and 1981.           
          Respondent filed a notice of objection to petitioner's cross-               
          motion for partial summary judgment.                                        
               Respondent issued a notice of deficiency on April 5, 1990,             
          determining deficiencies in and additions to petitioner's Federal           
          income taxes for the taxable years 1980 through 1982 as follows:            
                        Additions to Tax                                              
          Year    Deficiency   Sec. 6653(a)   Sec. 6653(a)(1)   Sec. 6661             
          1980    $76,748.00     $3,837             ---             ---               
          1981    125,013.15        ---          $6,250.65          ---               
          1982     47,634.00        ---           2,381.70      $11,908.50            

               The notice of deficiency determined a number of adjustments            
          related to Merit Securities issues.  See Seykota v. Commissioner,           
          T.C. Memo. 1991-234, supplemented by T.C. Memo. 1991-541.  A                
          timely petition was filed invoking the jurisdiction of this                 
          Court.  Soon after the pleadings were closed, the parties filed a           
          stipulation of settlement of tax shelter adjustments wherein they           
          agreed to be bound by the test case litigation in Seykota v.                
          Commissioner, supra.                                                        

          1(...continued)                                                             
          Procedure.                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011