Rusty K. London, f.k.a. Irving London - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
               The parties have presented substantial argument with respect           
          to the effect of a prior motion filed by respondent wherein, for            
          purposes of the motion, respondent computed petitioner's 1980 and           
          1981 tax liabilities allowing income averaging.  The Court                  
          subsequently permitted respondent to withdraw that motion.  We do           
          not deem the filing or withdrawal of said motion to be relevant             
          or a discussion thereof necessary for our holding herein.                   
               An appropriate order will be issued denying respondent's               
          motion for partial summary judgment and granting petitioner's               
          motion for partial summary judgment.                                        
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                             An appropriate order will                
                                        be issued.                                    
























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

Last modified: May 25, 2011