Lumber City Corporation, f.k.a. Neiman-Reed Lumber and Supply Company, Inc. - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         

               Ed Langley (Mr. Langley) was the manager of the wholesale              
          lumber business from the time Mr. Ruf became petitioner's CEO in            
          March 1986 and throughout the years at issue; however, he was               
          never an officer of petitioner during that period.  During the              
          years at issue, Mr. Langley talked with Mr. Ruf on the telephone            
          daily and met with him approximately once a week.  They dis-                
          cussed, inter alia, recruiting high caliber employees, raising              
          petitioner's credit standards for sales to outside customers, and           
          training petitioner's sales personnel to solicit customers.                 
          Compensation                                                                
               Petitioner paid Mr. Ruf the following amounts of compen-               
          sation during, and deducted those amounts in its Federal income             
          tax returns for, the years indicated:12                                     
                   Year Ended       Total Compensation Paid                           
                   Feb. 28, 1987               $80,000                                
                   Feb. 29, 1988               132,629                                
                   Feb. 28, 1989             1,454,746                                
                   Feb. 28, 1990             2,600,000                                
                   Feb. 28, 1991               750,000                                
          In its financial statements, petitioner expensed the following              
          amounts of compensation that it had accrued with respect to Mr.             




          12  In the first supplemental stipulation of facts, the parties             
          rounded the amounts of compensation petitioner deducted in its              
          Federal income tax returns and expensed in its financial state-             
          ments for the relevant years.  However, the record establishes              
          the exact amounts of such compensation, and we shall use herein             
          those exact amounts.                                                        



Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011