- 16 - Ed Langley (Mr. Langley) was the manager of the wholesale lumber business from the time Mr. Ruf became petitioner's CEO in March 1986 and throughout the years at issue; however, he was never an officer of petitioner during that period. During the years at issue, Mr. Langley talked with Mr. Ruf on the telephone daily and met with him approximately once a week. They dis- cussed, inter alia, recruiting high caliber employees, raising petitioner's credit standards for sales to outside customers, and training petitioner's sales personnel to solicit customers. Compensation Petitioner paid Mr. Ruf the following amounts of compen- sation during, and deducted those amounts in its Federal income tax returns for, the years indicated:12 Year Ended Total Compensation Paid Feb. 28, 1987 $80,000 Feb. 29, 1988 132,629 Feb. 28, 1989 1,454,746 Feb. 28, 1990 2,600,000 Feb. 28, 1991 750,000 In its financial statements, petitioner expensed the following amounts of compensation that it had accrued with respect to Mr. 12 In the first supplemental stipulation of facts, the parties rounded the amounts of compensation petitioner deducted in its Federal income tax returns and expensed in its financial state- ments for the relevant years. However, the record establishes the exact amounts of such compensation, and we shall use herein those exact amounts.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011