John Robert Maguire - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               (1)  Whether petitioner's expenditures related to                      
          residential real property were paid or incurred in carrying on a            
          trade or business pursuant to section 162 or for the production             
          of income pursuant to section 212.  We hold that most of these              
          expenditures are not deductible under either section.                       
               (2)  Whether petitioner is liable for a penalty pursuant to            
          section 6662(a) for negligence or disregard of rules or                     
          regulations.  We hold that petitioner is liable for the penalty.            
               All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in             
          effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the            
          Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise                 
          indicated.                                                                  
               We have combined our findings of fact and opinion.  Some of            
          the facts are stipulated and are so found.  We incorporate by               
          reference the stipulation of facts and attached exhibits.                   
               Petitioner resided in Wallingford, Connecticut, at the time            
          he filed the petition in this case.  Petitioner was a cash basis            
          taxpayer for the taxable year 1990.  He was employed full time as           
          a policeman in Wallingford, Connecticut.                                    
               In 1989, petitioner purchased a single-family home on Cape             
          Cod at Harwichport, Massachusetts, for $114,000.  This was                  
          petitioner's first real estate purchase.  Petitioner never                  
          occupied the home as a personal residence, and he never intended            
          to do so.  Petitioner originally intended to profit by selling              
          the property as opposed to renting it.  When petitioner purchased           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011