Bill McDonald - Page 30

                                       - 30 -                                         
               In addition to the items specifically proven by respondent,            
          petitioners conceded numerous adjustments determined by                     
          respondent to be unreported income or deductions to which                   
          petitioners were not entitled.                                              
               To the extent no settlement or concession was made regarding           
          any other item determined by respondent, petitioners have not               
          come forward with arguments or evidence from which we could find            
          that respondent’s determinations are in error.  Regarding the               
          fraud penalty, respondent has shown by clear and convincing                 
          evidence that petitioners' underpayments of 1989 tax were due to            
          fraud.                                                                      
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                             Decisions will be entered                
                                        under Rule 155.                               






















Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  

Last modified: May 25, 2011