- 30 - In addition to the items specifically proven by respondent, petitioners conceded numerous adjustments determined by respondent to be unreported income or deductions to which petitioners were not entitled. To the extent no settlement or concession was made regarding any other item determined by respondent, petitioners have not come forward with arguments or evidence from which we could find that respondent’s determinations are in error. Regarding the fraud penalty, respondent has shown by clear and convincing evidence that petitioners' underpayments of 1989 tax were due to fraud. To reflect the foregoing, Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Last modified: May 25, 2011