O. D. McKee and Estate of Anna Ruth McKee, Deceased, R. Ellsworth McKee and Jack C. McKee, Co-Executors - Page 25

                                       - 25 -                                         
          necessity of sacrificing the assets of the estate by immediate or           
          forced sale of the same, or any part thereof, and the                       
          expenditures properly incident thereto were clearly made for the            
          purposes of preserving and preventing waste of the estate".  Id.            
          at 726.  Additionally, the estate faced valuation disputes with             
          the Commissioner.  These claims and disputes showed that the                
          estate could not have been closed and the loans were warranted.             
          We held that the discount and redemption premiums that were                 
          authorized by a California court constituted proper                         
          administration expenses of the estate.                                      
               Respondent distinguishes Estate of Huntington, on the ground           
          that the loans in that case were authorized by a local probate              
          court.  However, section  20.2053-1(b)(2), Estate Tax Regs.                 
          provides that "a deduction * * * of a reasonable expense of                 
          administration, will not be denied because no court decree has              
          been entered if the amount would be allowable under local law."             
          In this regard, we note that the executor in Cleveland Bank and             
          Trust Co v. Olsen, 682 S.W.2d 200 (Tenn. 1984), did not seek                
          prior court approval for the loans it obtained.  Nonetheless, the           
          Tennessee Supreme Court held that the interest charged was a                
          proper administration expense where the testator had incorporated           
          the provision of Tenn. Code Ann. sec. 35-50-110 in his will.                
               Respondent attempts to bring this case within the scope of             
          Hibernia Bank v. United States, 581 F.2d 741 (9th Cir. 1978).  In           






Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011